Tuesday, 31 July 2007

Transition assistance programs: incorporating the private military industry into the equation

In a June post, ‘Supporting Britain’s Public and Private Security Personnel’, I commented on a British initiative aimed at encouraging business leaders to support the reserve forces: Supporting Britain’s Reservists and Employers (SaBRE). I noted that SaBRE implicitly highlights the fact that a number of the people involved in operations in Afghanistan and Iraq are not regular soldiers, but private personnel. While SaBRE is tailored for reservists and not private security personnel, it touches on the sensitive need to inform and educate the public and private employers about the growing role civilians play in arenas of conflict. It is a revolving door, not only between the military and the private sector, but also between military-oriented tasks and Civvy Street. There is the need to grease the wheels of this door in order to make sure transitions are smooth and there is a gracious exit to Civvy Street, hence initiatives such as SaBRE in the UK and the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) in the US are being enhanced.

TAP recently launched a new website to assist US veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq: TurboTAP. The website addresses what is becoming a problem, namely facilitating transitions for those who face difficulties in returning to old jobs or finding new ones. TurboTAP dresses in the now familiar structure of employment websites, providing general guidelines and offering a one-stop meeting point for candidates and employers. Yet an issue of concern is precisely that TurboTAP fails to set itself apart from other recruitment websites targeting the same audience. It is no a surprise therefore that the service goes under the ‘official transition assistance website’ banner. For once, it fails to provide guidelines to the public about the personal, practical, and professional challenges veterans returning to civilian life might face. Let us not forget that in the general public we find not only potential employers, but also people who are critical of the role played by many civilians in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Inevitably, to facilitate transitions they need to be informed. Wider access to authoritative material originating in the Department of Defense could throw new light on the issues at hand to critics as well as potential yet non-corporate employers. This broader focus would also work in setting TurboTAP apart from other employment websites.

Perhaps a good strategy is for the US to examine and amalgamate into TurboTAP SaBRE’s experience, and all the way round. The result could be a more robust service that is informative and useful to both returning veterans and the communities they are rejoining. Another issue that needs to be addressed is that some veterans might find themselves more at ease following a career that builds up from their recently acquired military experience. The private military and private security industries offer that alternative. These industries are perfectly aware and value the field experience of former military personnel and reservists. On the other hand, former military personnel and reservists already possess levels of security clearance that are necessary to undertake defence, military, and intelligence tasks outsourced by governments. At a time when a proven military background and a trustworthy service trajectory are increasingly in demand, it is time to bring vetted Private Military Companies and Private Security Companies into to the Transition Assistance equation. Inasmuch as the volatile times we are living call for it, the strategy could assist in alleviating an unfolding transition problem brought about by longer than expected campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Saturday, 28 July 2007

BAE backlash against axing of British export agency

Mike Turner, the chief executive of BAE Systems, has demanded a meeting with the Prime Minister after the responsibilities of the Defence Export Services Organisation (Deso) were transferred to the Trade and Industry department, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

read more | digg story

Read the letter (pdf) from Mike Turner, the chief executive of BAE Systems, to Gordon Brown, British Prime Minister: click here

BAE Systems Test Crisis Command Systems During ’Terrorist Attack’

BAE Systems successfully tested a mobile ground station for use by emergency services at a simulated crisis exercise in Valencia, Spain. The ground station is a key element of MARIUS — the Mobile Autonomous Reactive Information System for Urgency Situations — a technology project funded by the European Commission.

read more | digg story

In the news: BAE Systems

BAE Systems has a proud heritage of ground breaking inventions including Concorde, Radio communication, and the Harrier Jump Jet. In the changing world of defence and homeland security, technology and innovation are still at the heart of our business.

read more

BAE EIS Sending Its CREW to the Front Lines

BAE Systems' Information & Electronic Warfare Systems group in Nashua, NH produces electronic IED jammers that disrupt the remote signals (often cell phones) used to set off land mines in Iraq, Afghanistan, et. al. They're referred to as "Dismounted Counter Radio-Controlled Improvised Explosive Device (RCIED) Electronic Warfare (CREW) systems".

read more | digg story

2 British Firms Are Finalists for U.S. Job in Iraq

In what has become a contentious competition, Aegis Defence Services and ArmorGroup International are considered top contenders for a contract worth up to $475 million to provide intelligence services to the U.S. Army and security for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on reconstruction work in Iraq. Aegis won the initial contract in 2004.

read more | digg story

In the news: Aegis Defence Services

AEGIS specialises in the identification, analysis and mitigation of risk, providing a commercially focused and innovative approach to security and risk management through three distinct but complementary divisions: Research and Intelligence, Security Operations and Technical Services.

read more

Sunday, 8 July 2007

Scahill’s take on security contractors: ‘killer bees’ for the Google generation

Peter Singer’s ‘Corporate Warriors. The Rise of the Privatized Military’ Industry was published in 2003. The timing was excellent, as that was the year the Iraq war started. I do not need to elaborate on the visible role Private Military Companies (PMCs) and Private Security Companies (PSCs), the focus of Dr. Singer’s book, have played in the conflict. Off course Singer or Cornell University Press, the respectable publishing house behind the book, did not plan the release date to coincide with the onset of the war. Yet that is what happened. Singer’s book symbolically marked a decade since the PMC/PSC subject has been the focus of dedicated study. This is what we otherwise may refer to as scholarship, i.e. systematic work aimed at a contribution to knowledge. Moreover, either because of the timing of the book or that the study of this subject was due to explode into mainstream debate, Singer succeeded in transcending the expert community and introducing the subject to a broader audience. There are disagreements about Singer’s various arguments and conclusions. However, for a subject so pivotally important yet complex and polarizing, this was a genuine achievement. In 2005, Deborah Avant published ‘The Market for Force. The Consequences of Privatizing Security’, a compelling contribution to knowledge. By the time Singer published Corporate Warriors, Professor Avant had been already working on her elegant argument about the ‘control of force’ for a few years. For it takes painstaking work and time for serious research and scholarship to be produced. In this light, the air miles that Robert Young Pelton put while researching ‘Licensed to Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror’, which spans four continents and three years, made the troposphere his natural habitat as much as the many war zones he visited. In the words of Singer, Pelton’s book is ‘always interesting [and] truly captures the cast of characters that make up our new ‘coalition of the billing’ in the War on Terror’. Other equally relevant titles have been published on the topic, including ‘Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects’, an anthology covering the work of 34 authors. Some of them will be revised in future posts.


A different type of work altogether is ‘Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army’, put together by Jeremy Scahill and aggressively promoted by its publisher, the Nation Books. It is difficult not to discern that the book was crafted to cash on some of the unease and ill feelings that the Iraq conflict have engendered in a large proportion of the public, particularly in light of the coming US presidential election. Nonetheless, because someone touches those concerns, the empirical evidence underpinning them does not necessarily need to ring valid or accurate. Take for example the figures often quoted by the author in his many public appearances: the firm in question appears to employ 100,000 men for $1000 a day each. Even the most bizarre understanding of capitalism and conspiracy theories one could entertain would render the 36.5B a year cost of employing this ‘army’ farfetched. As for its ‘mercenary’ nature, a large proportion of these employees are in fact Iraqis and many of them work in tasks that have nothing to do with the military. Mr. Scahill chooses vignettes of evidence that suit his investigative-journalism style and is an able speaker who knows how to work his audience. After his presentation of 4 May 2007 at Sacramento City College, a student was reported to say she ‘felt both inspired and horrified from what she learned’. While inspiration is a good quality that encourages learning and understanding, it is important not to allow oneself to engage in a suspension-of-disbelief trance when dealing with such a sensitive topic. This is not a defense of the firm in question, but an invitation to anyone who believes has learned about PMCs/PSCs solely from this book to broaden his/her horizons and examine the vast scholarship available on the topic before reaching ‘horrifying’ conclusions. Many honest folks who make a living in the private military and security sectors, feed their families, pay their bills and mortgages, save money for their children’s education, and can only dream about the possibility of a $1000 a day job, deserve the effort.

Sunday, 1 July 2007

Three companies should prove to be better than one in supporting U.S. troop

the Pentagon has decided to inject some competition into its long-term troop support arrangement, the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, better known as LOGCAP IV. Three companies, KBR of Houston, DynCorp International of Fort Worth and Fluor Intercontinental of Greenville, S.C., will compete for projects in the Middle East worth up to $150 B.

read more | digg story